Congressman Randy Forbes | Capitol Monitor
Send me an email | Forward to a Friend | Share on: Share on Twitter Share on Facebook
February 23, 2011 Twitter Facebook YouTube Digg RSS
Audit the DoD
Throughout my time in Congress, one of my key priorities has been to protect and defend the United States of America. As Chairman of the House Armed Services Readiness Subcommittee, I have been one of the strongest advocates for a robust national defense; it is the basis of our current national security efforts and is central in determining strategies for our future security needs. However, I can only remain a strong advocate for a strong national defense that is efficient if we have access to good information.

Last month, the House Armed Services Committee held a hearing on budget cuts and efficiencies at the Department of Defense. What came out of that hearing was alarming. Department of Defense officials testified that Secretary of Defense Robert Gates failed to comply with a law requiring auditable financial statements at the Department of Defense. He didn’t just “miss” this compliance once. Secretary Gates failed to produce auditable financial statements in 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010 – every year since he has been at the helm of the Department of Defense’s current $708 billion budget. The Department of Defense is the only Department that has failed to provide auditable statements every year since they have been required. 

It was also acknowledged that the defense budget is not even in a position to be audited. In the same hearing, Secretary Lynn, the Chief Managing Officer of the Department of Defense said, “We owe it to the taxpayers to make the most of every dollar entrusted to us.”  I agree with Secretary Lynn, but the Department is not living up to this value. The Department of Defense has not only failed to measure twice. They are not measuring at all.

Last week, the President released his Fiscal Year 2012 budget proposal prompting Secretary Gates to come before the House Armed Services Committee to present his defense budget request to Congress. I questioned Secretary Gates about the audits. Secretary Gates said that he was unaware that the Department of Defense was in violation of the law when it did not file audit-ready financial statements in 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010. This, despite the fact that the Department of Defense’s own website reflects a “high priority” plan to be 100% audit-ready by 2010. When questioned about this inconsistency, Secretary Gates admitted that the Pentagon was 100% off in its “high priority” goal to be audit-ready by 2010.

In failing to the comply with the audit law, Secretary Gates has placed Members of Congress in the untenable position of considering the President’s budget request when no one can even tell Congress where defense dollars have been or where they are going. This is not the posture of a department or Administration who is interested in efficiencies or ensuring a strong national defense. It is the posture of a department that is taking advantage of taxpayer dollars.

There is growing unrest among Members of Congress across the country with both the Department of Defense’s failure to account for taxpayer dollars and its failure to provide adequate information to establish our future national defense priorities. Last year, Members from 22 states called on the House Armed Services Committee Chairman to subpoena Secretary Gates, based on their frustrations with the unparalleled degree of secrecy at the Pentagon. During his tenure, Secretary Gates has managed $2.5 trillion of taxpayer dollars, and the Department still does not have the ability to show how it is using that money.

With the Pentagon refusing to provide information and showing blatant disregard for Congress’ oversight responsibilities, Congress and the American people should be apprehensive about our defense spending. Most importantly, though, they should be concerned about the enormous impact it has on national security.  Without confidence that the Department of Defense is complying with the law, how can we have confidence in the defense budget, which is, in essence, the structure of any plan to defend the United States?

Regardless of where one stands on defense cuts – whether supportive of massive defense spending reductions, committed to looking for efficiencies, or  supportive of maintaining spending at current levels – all of these individuals deserve to know where defense dollars are going and that they are properly accounted for.

Last week, I offered an amendment to the Continuing Resolution, which funds the federal government until September, to cut the Secretary of Defense's “party” fund, which includes dining and entertainment costs associated with the Office of the Secretary of Defense, until the Department of Defense audits its books. I believe the amendment sends a clear message that the Department of Defense is not above the law and that Congress is serious about making the most of all taxpayer dollars spent on defense.

This amendment is just the first in a series of steps to change the culture in the Department of Defense: to renew their accountability to the taxpayers and to Congress. Over the next several weeks, I, along with several of my colleagues, will continue to press the Department of Defense for a full audit of the Pentagon.

Protecting and defending the United States remains one of my key priorities, and I intend to hold the Department of Defense accountable both in its stated priorities for the defense of our country and in the dollars it is spending. Auditing the Department of Defense will let the Pentagon know that we are no longer going to accept a pattern of secrecy with information it is holding and the way it spends its money. Our national security is too important and American taxpayers are too important.

Share this on: Share on Twitter Share on Facebook
Cut the "Party" Fund
Last week I offered an amendment to the Continuing Resolution to eliminate $2 million allocated to the Secretary of Defense to host parties and dinners until the Department of Defense complies with the law requiring auditable financial statements. Watch the video from our debate below.
George Will Op/Ed: The GOP's Defense Budget Mystery
Read this column by George Will on the Department of Defense budget. 
Follow this link to read. 
FTC Business Blog
Looking for quick, informal compliance guidance on privacy and security, marketing and advertising, and credit and finance? You'll find it on the Federal Trade Commission Business Blog.
Follow this link to learn more. 
Quiz: What’s the fastest growing portion of our federal budget?
Is the fastest growing portion of our budget entitlements, defense spending, domestic programs, or none of those? Find out on my blog.
Follow this link to find out. 
Other News
Feb 15, 2010
Forbes Urges Secretary Gates to Refrain from Defense Contracting Deal with China 
Feb 11, 2010
Forbes Introduces Bill to Preserve Integrity of Parent Relationships  
Feb 10, 2010
Forbes Reintroduces Bill to Establish Honor and Remember Flag as Official Symbol for the Fallen 
  Congressman Forbes discusses Hu Jintao's visit on Reuters TV. 
  Congressman Forbes is sworn in to the 112th Congress.
Home | Contact | Forward to a Friend | Unsubscribe | Subscribe | Privacy | Office Locations
Please do not reply to this message. This email address does not accept incoming messages. To send an email, click here.