Automatic Defense Cuts in the NewsPosted by Randy | April 05, 2012
Don’t miss the following news clips on the impact of automatic defense cuts featured on the House Armed Service Committee Drumbeat blog.
In addition, this article in the Wall Street Journal discusses how industry is bracing for defense cuts:
Contingency Planning Includes Massive Layoffs and Closing Facilities
The Wall Street Journal reports that as sequestration looms, major industry players are doing contingency planning that includes layoffs and closing facilities:
“The Pentagon has told congressional leaders it will start planning this summer to make the sharp reductions in military spending set to begin in January if lawmakers don't reach a broad deal to reduce the federal budget deficit.
“Several major defense contractors already have begun contingency planning, anticipating they may have to lay off employees, close facilities and reduce other costs if the spending cuts take effect.
“Many lawmakers on Capitol Hill don't expect to start serious negotiations over how to avoid the defense cuts until after the November elections…But the Pentagon has warned it can't wait that long to begin preparations for the possible layoffs of tens of thousands of federal workers and other fallout from major cuts in spending.
“Some defense contractors worry the Pentagon could begin delaying certain decisions on new projects as it tries to reprioritize its spending…
“‘It's become clear to the companies that sequestration is a real possibility,’ said Stan Soloway, chief executive of the Professional Services Council, a trade association for government contractors…
“If no deficit-reduction deal is reached, the law calls for the defense budget to be cut by more than $50 billion a year, or roughly 10% of the agency's $531 billion base budget. The cut would last for 10 years, and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has said the impact would be disastrous.
“Several senior Republicans, including House Armed Services Committee Chairman Howard ‘Buck’ McKeon of California, have proposed delaying the cuts in the first year…
“The uncertainty has alarmed government officials and defense companies, which now have less than eight months to prepare for cuts and possible layoffs…
“Frank Kendall, the Pentagon's acting under secretary for acquisition, technology and logistics, told Congress last week that the automatic cuts were ‘intended to be so crazy that nobody would ever do it.’
“Mr. Panetta would have little discretion to direct where the cuts would occur, meaning virtually every defense program would be hit.
“The aerospace and defense industry is pleading with Congress to reach a deal soon to avert the cuts. The industry employs about one million workers. Last year, the Aerospace Industries Association, a trade group, released a study that projected the sector would lose in the neighborhood of 350,000 direct and supplier jobs under the automatic cuts.
“Robert J. Stevens, chairman and CEO of Lockheed Martin Corp., told lawmakers and congressional aides last month that the spending cuts' impact on the defense industry would be ‘devastating.’
"‘We ask that we not let an automatic budget trigger, a default position, become the dominant force for allocating resources that will shape our nation's security posture and our industry, and we strongly urge action to stop this process,’ Mr. Stevens said at a Senate Aerospace Caucus luncheon.
“Dan Beck, a Boeing Co. spokesman, said his company already had begun to prepare for the impact of a possible ‘worst-case scenario’ of Pentagon cuts.
“Credit-rating agencies have raised questions about the effect of cuts on defense companies' finances.
"Fitch Ratings said last week that the ‘threat of across-the-board defense cuts’ was a concern and could affect Northrop Grumman Corp., a large defense contractor, but Fitch said it ‘expects a legislative resolution could reduce this risk, particularly with the respect to the timing of the cuts.’”
Read full story here.
Users are solely responsible for the opinions they post here and their comments do not necessarily reflect the views of Congressman Forbes.
Post a Comment
We encourage you to analyze and comment on the posts featured on this blog, but please understand that comments which include campaign content, engage in personal attacks, or include vulgar, profane, obscene, or inappropriate language will be removed from the site. Please note that there may be a brief delay in the publication of your comment.
RECENT POSTS03/03/2014 - It’s not optional, it’s Constitutional
02/28/2014 - Question of the week: Do you believe that reducing the carrier fleet will leave the United States less capable of meeting national security needs?
02/28/2014 - Less power for the IRS
02/25/2014 - Patients vs. politics
02/20/2014 - Question of the week: Do you believe that preserving open space is a permissible use of eminent domain?
02/11/2014 - New Opportunity for High School Students: Congressional STEM Competition