House Votes to Fix the Broken Budget ProcessPosted by Randy | February 07, 2012
People frequently ask me what initial steps we can take to turn our nation’s fiscal course. My answer: fix the broken budget process.
The Pro-Growth Budgeting Act that the House of Representatives passed last week – with my support – is an important step in that direction. Currently, the economic model the Congressional Budget Office uses to score legislative proposals assumes current law will remain unchanged over the course of the fiscal period scored and does not take economic growth into account. The Pro-Growth Budgeting Act would require the Congressional Budget Office to complete a supplemental macroeconomic analysis for legislation with an estimated budgetary impact of 0.25 percent of gross domestic product (approximately $39 billion in 2012) and greater. This will help account for important fiscal factors of proposals such as reducing the deficit, paying down the debt, and keeping tax rates low.
Most importantly, the legislation would force lawmakers to see beyond Washington’s bottom line and look at how their actions may directly affect the real economy and the lives of the American people when it comes to economic growth and job creation.
The Budget Act of 1974 created the current congressional budget process, under which Congress each year is supposed to develop a budget resolution that sets revenue and spending targets for the next fiscal year. Last year represented the sixth time since 1998, and the third time in the past six years, that Congress was unable to reach agreement on a budget.
It’s time to restore accountability, responsibility, and honesty to the budget process.
Read more about the legislation here.
Users are solely responsible for the opinions they post here and their comments do not necessarily reflect the views of Congressman Forbes.
Post a Comment
We encourage you to analyze and comment on the posts featured on this blog, but please understand that comments which include campaign content, engage in personal attacks, or include vulgar, profane, obscene, or inappropriate language will be removed from the site. Please note that there may be a brief delay in the publication of your comment.
RECENT POSTS03/03/2014 - It’s not optional, it’s Constitutional
02/28/2014 - Question of the week: Do you believe that reducing the carrier fleet will leave the United States less capable of meeting national security needs?
02/28/2014 - Less power for the IRS
02/25/2014 - Patients vs. politics
02/20/2014 - Question of the week: Do you believe that preserving open space is a permissible use of eminent domain?
02/11/2014 - New Opportunity for High School Students: Congressional STEM Competition