Question of the Week: Should the Administration approve construction plans of the XL pipeline running from Canada to Texas to create jobs and provide U.S. energy security?Posted by Randy | November 17, 2011
Last week, the Administration announced that it would delay approval of the TransCanada Corp.'s Keystone XL $7 billion pipeline, which would carry 700,000 barrels of crude oil a day from the tar sands of Alberta, Canada, to refineries in Texas. Such a large quantity of oil would reduce the United States' dependence on oil from nations that often do not share our nation's interests, such as those in the Middle East and South America. In response to the Administration's delay, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper met with Chinese President Hu Jintao and announced that Canada is considering the sale of its crude oil in the Asian market. Such a move, which is in direct response to the Administration's inaction, could hurt the creation of new American jobs and jeopardize future energy security.
Users are solely responsible for the opinions they post here and their comments do not necessarily reflect the views of Congressman Forbes.
Post a Comment
We encourage you to analyze and comment on the posts featured on this blog, but please understand that comments which include campaign content, engage in personal attacks, or include vulgar, profane, obscene, or inappropriate language will be removed from the site. Please note that there may be a brief delay in the publication of your comment.
RECENT POSTS12/04/2013 - It’s time for a permanent solution for physician reimbursement
12/04/2013 - Question of the week: Do you believe that the United States is safer today than it was just 2-3 years ago?
12/03/2013 - Modeling & simulation – the possibilities are endless
11/25/2013 - $700 million paid to dead beneficiaries
11/22/2013 - Let’s find a cure
11/21/2013 - Question of the week: Do you believe that the United States should unilaterally reduce the tough sanctions it has placed on Iran in the hope that doing so will make a deal to disarm their nuclear program more likely?