Question of the week: Do you support the ACCOUNT Act as a means of reining in federal spending?Posted by Randy | March 06, 2013
Last month, I asked whether you supported sequestration or an alternative plan to reduce spending. After nearly 80% responded that they preferred alternative spending cuts, I asked which alternatives to sequestration you support. Finally, I asked which legislative proposals voted on in the House or Senate you supported to avert sequestration.
This week we take a look at a far narrower bill designed to reign in government spending by increasing accountability for federal spending on conferences. Recently introduced, the Agency Conferences and Conventions Operating Under Necessary Transparency (ACCOUNT) Act, or H.R.283, seeks to control spending by requiring that conferences costing more than $25,000 must be approved by the head of the particular federal agency, and must have details posted on the agency website within 30 days of the conference, including the purpose, total cost and cost per employee attending. Each agency would be required to submit a report on their conferences to the relevant Congressional committee for the fiscal year. Under the ACCOUNT Act, conference spending would be public and federal agencies would use taxpayer money more wisely with the American people watching. This bill aims to crack down on wasteful practices and bring conference spending – such as the $823,000 spent by the U.S. General Services Administration in Las Vegas last year – into the light of day.
Question of the week: Do you support the ACCOUNT Act as a means of reining in federal spending?
( ) Yes.
( ) No.
( ) I don’t know.
( ) Other (share your thoughts below).
Take the Poll here.
Find the results of last week’s InstaPoll here.
Users are solely responsible for the opinions they post here and their comments do not necessarily reflect the views of Congressman Forbes.
Post a Comment
We encourage you to analyze and comment on the posts featured on this blog, but please understand that comments which include campaign content, engage in personal attacks, or include vulgar, profane, obscene, or inappropriate language will be removed from the site. Please note that there may be a brief delay in the publication of your comment.
RECENT POSTS05/23/2013 - Question of the week: Do you believe the scope of the subpoenas strikes the proper balance between the freedom of the press and the need to protect the American people?
05/20/2013 - GSA shorts small business by over $3 million
05/20/2013 - Time to Admit China is a Military Competitor
05/17/2013 - Question of the week: Do you believe the Prevent IRS Overreach Act is a necessary step in ensuring protection for the American people?
05/16/2013 - The Unaffordable Care Act
05/15/2013 - Questioning Eric Holder on Benghazi, IRS, and Fast and Furious