Question of the week: Do you believe the Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as the union between one man and one woman is constitutional for purposes of federal law?Posted by Randy | January 09, 2013
The Supreme Court announced this week that it will hear arguments in late March on two key cases involving same-sex marriage.
The justices have agreed to hear arguments in Hollingsworth v. Perry on the question of whether the U.S. Constitution bars California from limiting marriage to unions of one man and one woman. Proposition 8, passed by California voters in 2008, re-instated the traditional definition of marriage between a man and a woman.
The Supreme Court will also consider arguments in U.S. v. Windsor on whether the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) violates the U.S. Constitution. DOMA was enacted in 1996 and defines marriage as the union between one man and one woman for purposes of federal law. Another question before the Court is whether the House of Representatives’ Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group* can defend DOMA, even though President Obama deemed the law unconstitutional in 2011.
This week we’re asking you to weigh-in on two questions.
1st Question of the week: Do you believe the Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as the union between one man and one woman is constitutional for purposes of federal law?
( ) Yes
( ) No
( ) I don’t know.
( ) Other
2nd Question of the week: Who do you believe should define marriage in the United States?
( ) Federal Government
( ) State Governments
( ) I don’t know.
( ) Other
Take the poll here.
Find out the results of last week’s instaPoll here.
*The Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group is a five-member panel consisting of the Speaker of the House, Majority Leader, Majority Whip, Minority Leader, and Minority Whip. Under House rules, the advisory group has the authority to instruct the non-partisan office of the House General Counsel to take legal action on behalf of the House of Representatives.
Users are solely responsible for the opinions they post here and their comments do not necessarily reflect the views of Congressman Forbes.
Post a Comment
We encourage you to analyze and comment on the posts featured on this blog, but please understand that comments which include campaign content, engage in personal attacks, or include vulgar, profane, obscene, or inappropriate language will be removed from the site. Please note that there may be a brief delay in the publication of your comment.
RECENT POSTS06/14/2013 - Question of the week: Do you believe the purchase of Smithfield Foods, Inc. necessitates CFIUS review and investigation to ensure the safety and security of America’s citizens?
06/14/2013 - Dismantling Our Greatest Asset
06/07/2013 - Question of the week: Do you believe that a systematic lack of information sharing directly affects our national security?
06/07/2013 - House Judiciary to Holder: Explain Discrepancies Before Committee
06/05/2013 - Issues at the forefront of debate on defense policy bill
05/31/2013 - Since February, Government Racked up $300 Billion of New Debt