Randy's Blog

RSS Feed
Five Reasons to Reaffirm “In God We Trust” as Our National Motto
Posted by Randy | October 31, 2011

In January 2011, I introduced H.Con.Res.13, to reaffirm 'In God We Trust' as our national motto and encourage its display in public building and government institutions.  Since that point, the bill has gained 64 bipartisan cosponsors and was reported favorably out of the House Judiciary Committee in March of 2011. And this week, the resolution will be brought to the floor of House of Representatives for a vote.

“In God We Trust” has been our official national motto for over five decades, and it has been a pivotal part of our nation’s history for even longer.  So is it important that we reaffirm “In God We Trust” as our national motto? There are five reasons:

President Obama inaccurately proclaims "E Pluribus Unum' our national motto.
  Last November before a worldwide audience, in a much-anticipated and much-publicized speech focusing on the United States' relationship with the Muslim world, President Obama falsely proclaimed that our national motto was E pluribus unum. In reaction, 42 bipartisan Members of Congress wrote a letter calling on the President to correct his inaccurate statement, noting that the official national motto is In God We Trust. Not only did the President fail to issue a correction, he has failed to even respond to the letter. The uncorrected transcript of the Jakarta speech in which President Obama states, "In the United States, our motto is E pluribus unum -- out of many, one" remains on the White House websiteE pluribus unum has never been the motto of the United States.

Misunderstanding of the phrase "Separation of Church and State". 
The First Amendment to the Constitution reads, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”   The words ‘separation of church and state’ do not appear in the U.S. Constitution.  Rather, the phrase originates from a letter penned by Thomas Jefferson on January 1, 1802, to the Danbury Baptist Association.  In fact, just two days after sending this letter, on January 3, 1802, President Thomas Jefferson attended a church service in the U.S. Capitol. The Supreme Court has held, “The First Amendment, however, does not say that in every and all respects there shall be a separation of Church and State. . . We find no constitutional requirement which makes it necessary for government to be hostile to religion.” 

Rogue Court Challenges
.  Even despite the constitutionality of “In God We Trust” being established by the courts, just since 1996 there have been 7 direct court challenges to the motto. These cases are not isolated to one area of the country; instead, one-third of our federal circuit courts across the United States have heard appeals challenging “In God We Trust”.   Some groups bringing these challenges directly seek "freedom from religion," a goal which grossly distorts the constitutionally-granted "freedom of religion." These cases have sought to challenge the motto itself, as well as its inscription on our currency and display on public buildings. In every case, the courts have upheld the constitutionality of the national motto.  Other court challenges have been brought in recent years aimed at prayer in school, the long-standing displays of crosses at veteran’s memorials, the words ‘under God’ in the Pledge of Allegiance, the National Day of Prayer, and the words ‘so help me God,’ frequently used to conclude the presidential oath of office. 

Inaccuracies and Omissions in the Half-Billion-Dollar Capitol Visitor Center.
 In 2008, the over half-billion dollar Capitol Visitor Center opened for the purpose of educating over 15,000 Capitol visitors daily on the “legislative process as well as the history and development of the architecture and art of the U.S. Capitol.”  When finally opened, however, Capitol Visitor Center historians had sanitized the public building of any references to our national motto, including replacing the inscription of ‘In God We Trust,’ inscribed above the Speaker’s Rostrum with stars in a replica of the House Chamber and cropping an actual picture of the chamber so you could not see the words ‘In God We Trust.’  Additionally, a plaque was placed in the Visitors Center falsely "educating" visitors the national motto was “E Pluribus Unum.”  Only after Members of Congress intervened publically and legislatively were these omissions and inaccuracies corrected. 

Efforts to Remove God from Public Domain.
 In recent years unelected government bureaucrats have become increasingly apt to remove, obscure, or bar references to God or our national motto, even when their actions reverse decades of long-standing traditions.  In most cases, congressional intervention and pressure was required to reverse the decision. 

  • The Department of Veterans Affairs attempted to ban flag folding recitations at military funerals that referenced God or religion, even if specifically requested by the family of the deceased.
  • The U.S. Mint attempted to remove the inscription "In God We Trust" from the front of the new Presidential dollar and instead print it on the edge of the coin.  
  • The National Park Service attempted to turn a capstone replica of the Washington Monument, bearing the inscription "Laus Deo" or "Praise be to God" so the public could not read it.
  • The Navy and Air Force attempted to enact policies that would have affected the ability of military chaplains to pray according to their religious conscience.
  • The Architect of the Capitol refused a teen's request for a certificate noting his grandfather's "love of God, country and family" to accompany a souvenir flag that had flown over the building - a decision that would have prohibited even the Pledge of Allegiance from being printed on the flag certificates.
Users are solely responsible for the opinions they post here and their comments do not necessarily reflect the views of Congressman Forbes.
  • Thomas G commented on 10/31/2011
    While firmly in support of the national motto...my goodness why on earth does this need reaffirming when we have so many other urgent priorities. This just continues to dramtically demonstrate an enormous disconnect with the voters. I am very disappointed this subject matter ended up on the blog at such a critical moment in what America needs to be focusing on. Why can't we talk about why congressman Forbes refuses to even consider a 1 penny increase in the tax of millionaires and billionaires? And as far as regulations are concerned...there's this nugget... "The Bureau of Labor Statistics, which tracks companies' reasons for large layoffs, found that 1,119 layoffs were attributed to government regulations in the first half of this year, while 144,746 were attributed to poor "business demand."
  • Alexander Bell commented on 10/31/2011
    By saying "In God We Trust", we are acknowledging that a God does indeed exist beyond all doubt and that he is the God referred to by Judeo/Christian texts and beliefs. Please realize that this phrase was added back in the 1950's as a defense against the "communist agenda." Now realize that our world is made up of many different people with many different beliefs and many different values. Forcing all children in this country to acknowledge the existence of "God" is wrong.
  • Robb Newton commented on 11/1/2011
    Get back to your job, Congressman, and quit wasting taxpayer money trying to win evangelicals' votes. The fact of the matter is that the phrase "In God We Trust" is blatantly exclusionary to the 50 million Americans who are agnostic, atheist, or nonreligious. One needs only to consider the equally ridiculous phrases "In Thor We Trust" or "In Zeus We Trust" to realize how arbitrary and biased your favorite phrase is. Do your job.
  • Note From Georgia commented on 11/1/2011
    Just wanted to say "thank you" to Mr. Forbes for standing up for our nation's true motto !
  • Thomas G commented on 11/1/2011
    Ok congressman...this initiative apparently costs the tax payers 215,000.00 and once again you have provided no plan whatsoever to pay for this spending. It is spend spend spend on your watch. During your tenure in the congress we have added 10 TRILLION dollars to the national debt...and you voted to shove our nation into default instead of honoring the nation's obligations and the will of the American people.
  • Terrance McGowan commented on 11/1/2011
    What a sad state in America when these so-called statesmen and women live in their own world. This oligarchy will be broken as americans are starting to see that their government has been bought and paid for by corporations. The top 1% have never had it better.
  • Maureen DeHart commented on 11/2/2011
    While you were so busy pandering to the evangelicals how many real people are falling into poverty daily? Stop wasting time and start fixing real problems. Oil subsidies and tax cuts for the rich are great fund raising opportunities for Republican politician's coffers, stop being part of the problem and try becoming part of the solution. We need to improve the condition of the middle class. If you need to reaffirm something.... reaffirm social security and medicare.... reaffirm food for hungry children.... reaffirm jobs for teachers, police officers and firemen..... do something!
  • David Ivester commented on 11/3/2011
    The government's inscription of the phrase "In God we trust" on coins and currency, as well as its addition of the words "under God" to the pledge of allegiance in 1954 and adoption of the phrase "In God we trust" as a national motto in 1956, were mistakes, which should be corrected. Under our Constitution, the government has no business proclaiming that "we trust" "In God." Some of us do, and some of us don't; each of us enjoys the freedom to make that choice; the government does not and should not purport to speak for us in this regard. Nor does the government have any business calling on its citizens to voice affirmation of a god in any circumstances, let alone in the very pledge the government prescribes for affirming allegiance to the country. The unnecessary insertion of an affirmation of a god in the pledge puts atheists and other nonbelievers in a Catch 22: Either recite the pledge with rank hypocrisy or accept exclusion from one of the basic rituals of citizenship enjoyed by all other citizens. The government has no business forcing citizens to this choice on religious grounds, and it certainly has no business assembling citizens' children in public schools and prescribing their recitation of the pledge--affirmation of a god and all--as a daily routine.
  • John Boren commented on 11/4/2011
    I do not support this resolution. Leave God out of government.
Post a Comment
We encourage you to analyze and comment on the posts featured on this blog, but please understand that comments which include campaign content, engage in personal attacks, or include vulgar, profane, obscene, or inappropriate language will be removed from the site. Please note that there may be a brief delay in the publication of your comment.
Address (optional):

*By leaving a comment on this blog, you are subscribing to my e-mail newsletter.