Members of Congress to Top U.S. Trade Official: Hold Chinese Manufacturers AccountablePosted by Randy | July 08, 2011
If you have followed the issue of Chinese drywall over the past couple of years, you know that it has destroyed thousands of homes and the financial lives of many families in the United States. The contaminated drywall, manufactured in China and imported into Hampton Roads, emits semi-toxic sulfur gasses that corrode metal and have been linked to adverse health conditions.
Because our courts have limited ability to impose or enforce judgments against foreign companies, finding resolution in the case has been a lengthy process. In April, a federal judge awarded five Virginia homeowners $2.6 million dollars in a lawsuit against the Chinese firm. However, the company filed an appeal and is now challenging the U.S. court’s jurisdiction over the issue.
I believe these Chinese companies must be held accountable for the effects of their hazardous product.
Just this week, I joined with ten of my colleagues in taking the issue to the Administration's top trade official asking that he hold Chinese manufacturers accountable. In our letter to U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk, we specifically requested a summary of actions the office has taken so far and its plan of action moving forward.
A copy of the letter is available here. You can also read about it in this article on the Virginian-Pilot online.
Do you agree that these Chinese drywall manufacturers need to be held accountable?
Users are solely responsible for the opinions they post here and their comments do not necessarily reflect the views of Congressman Forbes.
Post a Comment
We encourage you to analyze and comment on the posts featured on this blog, but please understand that comments which include campaign content, engage in personal attacks, or include vulgar, profane, obscene, or inappropriate language will be removed from the site. Please note that there may be a brief delay in the publication of your comment.
RECENT POSTS03/10/2014 - Question of the week: Do you support such assistance to Ukraine from the United States in the face of Russian aggression?
03/03/2014 - It’s not optional, it’s Constitutional
02/28/2014 - Question of the week: Do you believe that reducing the carrier fleet will leave the United States less capable of meeting national security needs?
02/28/2014 - Less power for the IRS
02/25/2014 - Patients vs. politics
02/20/2014 - Question of the week: Do you believe that preserving open space is a permissible use of eminent domain?