Posted by Randy | May 20, 2013
I wanted to share with you an article I wrote that was published by National Review, regarding China as a military competitor. We must acknowledge China’s military ambitions and their potential consequences for U.S. interests in the region. By assessing the intentions of the Chinese, the United States will be better prepared to evaluate our interests in Asia and act accordingly.
Time to Admit China Is a Military Competitor
By J. Randy Forbes
May 17, 2013 1:56 PM
Posted by Randy | November 30, 2012
Last the weekend, China’s Defense Ministry released video and pictures of a Chinese J-15 fighter jet taking off and landing from its aircraft carrier, the Liaoning.
The news marks a significant milestone for China 14 years after it acquired the unfinished carrier from the Ukraine, 18 months after its first sea trials and two months after its commissioning into the People’s Liberation Army Navy. Though significant work lies ahead to make the Liaoning combat operational, the commencement of carrier-based, fixed-wing flight operations puts China in elite company, with only five other nations with these current capabilities – The U.S., Russia, France, India and Brazil.
This comes during a time of increasing concern among China’s neighbors in the Pacific, many of which remain embroiled in territorial disputes with China over the long-term regional intentions of the People’s Liberation Army and the Chinese Communist Party. This week, Congressman Forbes moderated an important discussion at the Foreign Policy Initiative entitled, “All Eyes on Asia: Perspectives From Our Allies” between representatives of several nations in the region on their security concerns and the re-rise of China.
Additionally, click here to read about Congressman Forbes’ work as Chairman and founder of the Congressional China Caucus, whose primary mission is to investigate and educate its members on the emergence of China’s global reach and the consequences of its growing international, economic, and political influence on U.S. interests.
Question of the week: Given China’s growing military capabilities, do you consider China….
( ) a partner of the United States
( ) friendly, but not a partner of the United States
( ) a competitor to the United States
( ) an adversary to the United States
( ) I don't know
( ) Other (Leave your comments below)
Take the poll here.
Find out the results of last week’s instapoll here.
Find out the results of my instapoll about the “Fiscal Cliff” here.
Days after DoD Fails to Release China Military Power Report, China Announces Military Spending to Top $100 BillionPosted by Randy | March 07, 2012
Just days after the Department of Defense failed to release its annual report to Congress on China’s military power, China announced that its military spending will top $100 billion for the first time. This a double-digit increase on last year's military spending, and comes “as China’s neighbors are increasingly unnerved by the country’s growing assertiveness in pressing territorial claims,” according to the Washington Post.
The news of this increase alone fuels concerns about China’s long-term intentions. Taken within the context of DoD military power report delay, it raises significant questions about our nation’s long-term strategy, or lack thereof, for responding in an era of Chinese military modernization. The DoD report is critical for the United States to be able to evaluate its own defense strategy in light of a dramatic military buildup by China in the Western Pacific. Each day without the report is another without a necessary tool to understand the Department of Defense’s perspective on China in light of this continued military buildup.
Read about the letter I sent to Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, asking him to comply with the law and release the report on China’s military power: http://forbes.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=282971
Posted by Randy | February 23, 2012
According to a new forecast by the research group IHS Global Insight, China is set to double its defense spending between 2011 and 2015. This increase from $119.8 billion to $238.2 billion will exceed the combined spending of the next twelve largest defense budgets in the Asia-Pacific region, solidifying China's status as a regional superpower.
Question of the Week: Do you support the Administration's decision opposing construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline?Posted by Randy | January 19, 2012
Yesterday, the Administration announced that it had rejected plans for construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline from the tar sands of Alberta, Canada to U.S. Gulf Coast Refineries. Although several environmental studies related to construction had been completed, the Administration continued to delay issuing a final decision on construction of the pipeline. As a result, Congress issued a requirement at the end of last year that the Administration issue a decision within 60 days of the President signing the payroll tax cut extension into law. The rejection has been applauded by organizations that had resisted construction of the pipeline due to environmental concerns, but has also been opposed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business organizations that point to the estimated 120,000 jobs and steps toward energy independence the pipeline would create. TransCanada, the corporation seeking the permit to construct the pipeline, must now find another recipient for its 830,000 barrels of oil a day it plans to export. In November, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper indicated that China may be interested in procuring the North American energy.
Question of the Week: Do you support the Administration's decision opposing construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline?
( ) Yes, I support the Administration's decision regarding construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline.
( ) No, I oppose the Administration's decision regarding construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline.
( ) Other (share your thoughts below)
( ) I am unsure.
Take the poll here.
Find the results of last week's instaPoll here.
Read Congressman Forbes' statement in regard to the Administration's decision here.
Posted by Randy | January 19, 2012
Posted by Randy | January 17, 2012
Posted by Randy | January 11, 2012
A new piece from The Diplomat titled “China’s 2012 Challenges” lays out twelve key challenges that the People’s Republic of China and the Chinese Communist Party will face during the next year. These challenges range from the need for economic reforms, to social instability and expected friction in the South China Sea. It is vital that American policymakers know and understand these challenges while prioritizing U.S. foreign policy initiatives. Here are three of the twelve challenges identified in the piece:
The piece can be read in its entirety here: http://the-diplomat.com/china-power/2012/01/08/chinas-2012-challenges/
Posted by Randy | January 05, 2012
The Chinese government revealed in a white paper a new five-year plan for space exploration that expands the nation’s goals for challenging U.S. space superiority by creating new spacecrafts, satellites and a space lab by 2016.
China’s white paper specifically says that “China will strengthen its basic capacities of the space industry, accelerate research on leading-edge technology and continue to implement important space scientific and technological projects, including human spaceflight, lunar exploration, high-resolution Earth observation system, satellite navigation and positioning system, new-generation launch vehicles and other priority projects in key fields.”
The New York Times reports that “Under the new space plan, it would vastly expand its version of a Global Positioning System, which would have military as well as civilian uses. The plan shows how the government intends to draw on military and civilian resources to meet the goals, which the government is betting will also produce benefits for the Chinese economy.”
I am concerned that China is looking for ways to exert its strength through space exploration, while the United States is scaling back on our own program. This is especially true as China has failed to reassure the U.S. and other nations of its peaceful intentions in space, beginning in 2007 when it destroyed an orbiting weather satellite signaling to the world that it had the capability to intentionally destroy our communications networks and certainly had the capability to unintentionally damage our assets in space with the considerable debris left behind.
What kind of implications do you think China’s five-year plan will have for the United States? Weigh in below.
Posted by Randy Forbes | December 20, 2011
What does the death of North Korean Leader Kim Jong Il mean for North Korea, China and the surrounding region? In addition to potentially bringing a dangerous period of transition for northeast Asia as his youngest son takes the reins, an article in the Wall Street Journal points out that China “has long worried that a collapse of the regime in Pyongyang could bring South Korean and U.S. troops perilously close to its border.”
Here are three news articles from the Wall Street Journal that discuss the impact of the North Korean leader’s death, particularly as it relates to China and the surrounding region.
North Korean Leader Kim Jong Il is Dead
Pyongyang's Uncertainty Hangs Over Region
China Reactions to Kim Jong Il's Death
RECENT POSTS05/20/2013 - GSA shorts small business by over $3 million
05/20/2013 - Time to Admit China is a Military Competitor
05/17/2013 - Question of the week: Do you believe the Prevent IRS Overreach Act is a necessary step in ensuring protection for the American people?
05/16/2013 - The Unaffordable Care Act
05/15/2013 - Questioning Eric Holder on Benghazi, IRS, and Fast and Furious
05/14/2013 - IRS Targets American Taxpayers Over Politics